Should abacavir be a first-line option for adults with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa?

Background: Despite a poor toxicity profile, zidovudine supersedes abacavir as a first-line agent in many international treatment guidelines due to concerns about HLA-B*57:01-related abacavir-hypersensitivity. An important question is whether abacavir should become a first-line option in resource limited settings where HLA-B*57:01 is sufficiently rare. In one of the largest HLA-typing efforts in sub-Saharan Africa, we assessed HLA alleles among 581 HIV-infected patients in Kampala (n=81) and Mbarara (n=500) to guide regional clinical decision-making.
Methods: Specimens were drawn from the UARTO cohort, including 81 pilot subjects enrolled from Kampala during 2002-2004 and 500 subjects enrolled from Mbarara during 2005-2010, just prior to antiretroviral therapy initiation. HLA-typing was performed using Roche/454/Fluidigm HLA Typing Kits following the Roche protocols. HLA alleles and genotypes were called using the Conexio ATF 454 HLA typing software.
Results: Samples from 52 (64%) individuals in Kampala, and 461 (92%) individuals in Mbarara yielded successful HLA-genotyping results. HLA-B*57:01 was not observed in the 52 Kampala subjects. In the main Mbarara cohort, one subject was heterozygous for HLA-B*57:01 among 461 subjects (0.2% prevalence). This subject did not receive abacavir during study observation from 2006 - 2011. Overall, during the entire follow up duration from 2005-2015 in Mbarara, only two other patients ever-used abacavir (0.4% usage rate); neither had HLA-B*57:01. The low prevalence of HLA-B*5701 is consistent with other smaller studies conducted in sub-Saharan Africa.
Conclusions: Given the low prevalence of HLA*B57:01 carriage in our cohort and others in sub-Saharan Africa (Table 1), the cautious use abacavir-based therapy may be more advisable than zidovudine-based therapy when tenofovir is not a viable option. The benefits of abacavir over zidovudine-based therapy should be considered in regional guidelines given abacavir has superior efficacy, once-daily dosing, and has been studied as a component of regimens containing integrase strand transfer inhibitors.


CountryRegion/ EthnicitySample sizeAllele frequencyReceived abacavir?Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction rateReferences
KenyaNandi2400.0083NoNACao, 2004
KenyaLuo2650.0076NoNACao, 2004
MaliDogon138NANoNACao, 2004
UgandaKampala1610.0311NoNACao, 2004
ZambiaLusaka440.0114NoNACao, 2004
Guiné-BissauNA650NoNASpínola, 2005
UgandaKampala, Entebbe3000Yes6/300 (2%)Munderi, 2011
UgandaKampala520NoNAThis study
UgandaMbarara4610.001NoNAThis study
[Table1. Prevalence of B*5701 in sub-Saharan Africa]

G.Q. Lee1,2,3, S. McCluskey3,4, Y. Boum5, P.W. Hunt6, J.N. Martin6, D.R. Bangsberg3,7, G. Xiaojiang8, P.R. Harrigan1, J.E. Haberer7, M.J. Siedner3,5,7
1BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada, 2Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States, 3Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States, 4Massachusetts General Hospital, Infectious Disease Division, Boston, United States, 5Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda, 6University of California, San Francisco, United States, 7Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States, 8National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Frederick, United States